Satish Kumar v. Stat Eof Hy And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16450-2002 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.11.2024 Satish Kumar

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY *****

Present:

Mr. Armaan Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dushyant Saharan, AAG, Haryana.

***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1.

Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the impugned order dated 08.02.2002, Annexure P-13, might not, due to efflux of time, even be surviving.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instructions. 3.

Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case need arises.

4.

Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 08.11.2024 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No HAMANT 2024.11.08 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document