Hardial Singh And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ANR
!
"#$%$ &'
()*) + ,
)))) $ $ &-% .-%/%
,
)))%0 &"& % '
1+ ,) , 2 ,
!
2 ,
) )
- 3 " # $% &' (! ) *) !*!! )+(, -)*.&/% #/
#0 ##%1##$# %% 2 22# %
3,45 % +667 8!9
1
!
5 # # #%% # " / 1# % 2 !:
*!
!*!6 #/;&##$ % %21% 22
! ) !) *3 !*!6 2 /< # % # # #2 1 2 # 12 &'$$
"22 12%1 # " ##4/
!
"## 5%/1 )(! / / ##1 2 % ,2 # $15%/1 21$ #11 "1$% 22#
# .
5= #2/$
"
%
!
#% / 1 /$2# %12, 2
"#6: %2 , "57. The position that emerges from the above discussion can be summarised thus: the power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the offences under Section 320 of the Code. Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation
3 but it has to be exercised in accord with the guideline engrafted in such power viz; (i) to secure the ends of justice or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court.
xxx xxx xxx. "
:
&1, %2% #/% %2 ##2 179 2, #/ $% &'1## $## , 1 # ## "#1# % % 2# % $
( '####1 &' (! ) *) !*!! )+(, -)*.&/% #/ , #0 # ##$# %$ $79 227 8,!9 2 ' ****;, ># & ?'/ %1 2
9.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
2 , ()*)
&"0 >%;
@; >' #
@;