← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/7274/2025allowed

Hardial Singh And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ANR

2025-03-26Ms. Justice Kirti Singh3 pages

    

 

    

!

"#$%$ &'

()*)  + , 



)))) $ $ &-% .-%/%

,

  



)))%0 &"& % '

 1+ ,) , 2 , 

  



 



  





   !

2 ,

) )

- 3  "        #    $%    &'   (!  ) *) !*!! )+(, -)*.&/% #/

#0 ##%1##$# %% 2 22# %

 3,45  % +667 8!9 

1

!

5 # # #%% # "  /  1#  %      2        !:

*!

!*!6   #/;&##$ %  %21% 22

! )     !) *3 !*!6    2 /< # % # # #2     1 2 # 12   &'$$

"22  12%1 #   " ##4/ 



    

   

!

"## 5%/1      )(!  /  /    ##1    2 %    ,2  #  $15%/1 21$  #11   "1$% 22#

# .

5= #2/$





       "

%

!

#%        / 1  /$2# %12, 2 

"#6:  %2   , "57. The position that emerges from the above discussion can be summarised thus: the power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the offences under Section 320 of the Code. Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation

3 but it has to be exercised in accord with the guideline engrafted in such power viz; (i) to secure the ends of justice or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court.

xxx xxx xxx. "

:

&1,  %2% #/% %2 ##2 179 2, #/ $% &'1## $## ,  1      # ## "#1#  %  %   2# %   $

( '####1  &'  (! ) *) !*!! )+(, -)*.&/% #/ , #0 # ##$# %$ $79 227 8,!9  2    ' ****;,               >#    & ?'/ %1 2

9.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. 

2 , ()*)

 

&"0 >%;

@;  >' #

@;