Nirmala Devi @ Nirmal Gupta v. Sushil Kumar

2024:PHHC:021749

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR No.877 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.02.2024 Nirmala Devi @ Nirmal Gupta and others ...Revisionists-Petitioners

Versus

Sushil Kumar

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present:- Mr. Nitesh Singhi, Advocate for the revisionists-petitioners.

Mr. Vivek Salathia, Advocate and Mr. Shehbaz Thind, Advocate for the respondent-Caveator.

***** MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent-Caveator inform the Court that the possession of the demised premises has been handed over to their client in pursuance of the order passed by the Executing Court. Learned counsel for the petitioners-tenants also acknowledges the above-said fact.

At this stage, learned counsel for both the parties submit that the instant revision-petition be disposed of as the same has, now, been rendered infructuous.

Resultantly, the revision-petition in hand stands disposed of accordingly.

15.02.2024 (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether Reportable:

No NEETU RANI 2024.02.15 18:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD