(O&M)Narender Kumar v. Parveen Kumari

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.1811 of 1988(O&M) Date of Decision: December 01, 2015 Narinder Kumar and another ....Appellants versus Smt.Parveen Kumari and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

--- Present: Ms.Madhu Dayal, Advocate, for the appellants. -.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellants states that this appeal has been rendered infructuous for the reason that the respondent-tenants have purchased the subject-property. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous.

December 01, 2015 [SURYA KANT] mohinder JUDGE MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.12.04 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh