Baljit Singh v. State Of Haryana And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM A-1284-MA of 2016 Date of Decision: 04.12.2018 Baljit Singh .....Applicant

Versus

State of Haryana and another ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR TYAGI

Present:

Mr. Shekhar Gupta, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Praveen Bhadu, Assistant A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Ashish Pannu, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** T.P.S. MANN, J. (ORAL) The complainant has filed the present application under Section 378 (3) read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking leave to appeal against the judgment dated 01.06.2016 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Ambala, whereby Kamaljit Singh accused, respondent No.2 herein, was acquitted of the charge under Sections 323, 324, 326, 341 read with Sections 34 and 506 IPC.

On perusal of the judgment passed by the learned lower appellate Court it is made out that though respondent No.2 was previously known to the complainant party, yet he was not named as an accused at the time of registration of FIR. VINAY 2018.12.07 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM A-1284-MA of 2016 -2In view of the above, no fault can be found with the finding arrived at by the learned Sessions Judge, Ambala, while acquitting respondent No.2-Kamaljit Singh. The application is without any merit and, therefore, dismissed. Leave to appeal is declined.

( T.P.S. MANN ) JUDGE 04.12.2018 ( ARUN KUMAR TYAGI ) Vinay JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No VINAY 2018.12.07 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document