Bijender v. State Of Haryana & ORS

CRM-A-1327-MA-2016
225/2 CRM-A-1327-MA-2016 (O&M) BIJENDER VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

Present:

Mr. Virender Soni, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Shiva Khurmi, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Kulwinder Bhargav, Advocate for the private respondents.

**** CRM-22326-2016 Present application has been filed for condonation of delay of 56 days in filing the accompanying appeal.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 56 days in filing the accompanying appeal, is condoned. CRM-A-1327-MA-2016 Counsel for the applicant submits that they have a very good case on merit and there is sufficient evidence on record which is sufficient for conviction of the private respondents No.2 to 8 & conviction of respondents No. 9 to 14 under Section 216 IPC and respondents No.4 and 6 under Section 25 of Arms Act. There is no appreciation of evidence qua the above said private respondents and offence attracted in the judgment dated 09.03.2016.

Learned counsel for the private respondents opposed the prayer. Leave to appeal granted.

Registry to assign number to appeal.

Main appeal Heard.

Admitted.

The accused-respondents No.2 to 14, to execute a bond for attendance within two months, undertaking to appear in this Court, in case appeal is allowed. Given above, the accused- respondents No.2 to 14 shall furnish a personal bond RAJEEV PUROHIT 2025.12.05 09:45 I agree to specified portions of this document

CRM-A-1327-MA-2016
of Rs. Twenty five Thousand only (INR 25,000/-), and furnishing one surety for Rs. Twenty five thousand only (INR 25,000/-), to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Before accepting the sureties, the concerned Court must satisfy that if the accused fails to appear in Court, then such surety is capable of producing the accused before the Court.

The furnishing of the personal bonds shall be deemed acceptance of the all stipulations, terms, and conditions of this bail order. Registry to communicate this order to the trial Court without any delay. In case of failure of respondents No.2 to 14 to furnish bond, the concerned Court shall proceed further in accordance with law.

There would be no need for a certified copy of this order for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the accused can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and attest it to be a true copy. In case the attesting officer wants to verify the authenticity, such an officer can also verify its authenticity and may download and use the downloaded copy for attesting bonds. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 02.12.2025 (SUKHVINDER KAUR) Rajeev (rvs) JUDGE RAJEEV PUROHIT 2025.12.05 09:45 I agree to specified portions of this document