(O&M) Shiv Dayal And ORS. v. Bal Kishan

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.2031 of 1988 (O&M) Date of Decision.14.03.2019 Shiv Dayal and others ...Appellants Vs Bal Kishan

...Respondent

2.

C.R. No.2587 of 1992 Bal Kishan

...Petitioner

Vs Shiv Dayal and another

...Respondents

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Advocate for the appellants in RSA No.2031 of 1988 and for respondents in C.R. No.2587 of 1992.

Mr. Ritesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner in C.R. No.2587 of 1992 and for the respondent in RSA No.2031 of 1988.

-.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that both the cases have become infructuous as the parties have arrived at compromise.

Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the factum of compromise.

Both the regular second appeal and the revision petition are dismissed as having become infuctuous, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE March 14, 2019 Pankaj* Whether Reasoned/Speaking No Whether Reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.03.20 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document