Om Parkash Ahuja v. State Of Punjab And Others

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No. 3837 of 2022 Date of Decision: 28.02.2022 Om Parkash Ahuja ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. Ferry Sofat, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Nikhil Chopra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent No.1 to 4.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondent No.1 to 4 to restrain the respondent No.5 from constructing the building without sanction of the building plan. The petitioner claims that he is running a shop from the adjoining premises. 2.

The learned counsel representing the petitioner, after arguing for some time, admits that the petitioner has an effective alternative remedy. 3.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, this Court is not inclined to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction. The petitioner, if so advised, may avail an alternative remedy.

4.

With the observations made above, the present writ petition is disposed of.

(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge February 28, 2022 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.02.28 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document