Narinder Kaur v. State Of Punajb & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12198-2001 Date of decision: 28.05.2024 Narinder Kaur ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY *****

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab.

***** AMAN CHAUDHARY. J (Oral) 1.

Learned State counsel refers to para 4 of the reply, which reads thus:

"Admitted to the extent that the petitioner passed the Matriculation examination in first division and as per guidelines she has been awarded extra 2 marks for her first division. (10 for Metric and 2 for first division). In the present case the petitioner secured only 14 marks on the basis of her qualification and performance shown in the interview and could not be selected being lower in the merit."

2.

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case need arises. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 28.05.2024 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No HAMANT 2024.05.30 19:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment