Anita Mahapatra And ANR v. Bank Of Baroda (Erstwhile) And ANR
-1-
ANITA MAHAPATRA AND ANR
BANK OF BARODA (ERSTWHILE VIJAYA BANK) AND ANR
Present:- Mr. B.S. Tewatia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. C.S. Pasricha, Advocate (Through V.C.) and Mr. Sushil K. Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent - Bank.
!" #####
$ " % & '($) * $+
, , - $' *+
!"!"
#$
& ' (
")
!
!
%
(
! ! +
!,!- +
* .
!
( (
%
* .
!
!
/
*
(
-2- +
!
* '
% +
345&$",!
.
$# .#
6"!-!",!
.
"6
+
!67 ,)8!6-
6"!-!",!
4
!"!"
& ' (
#
%
+
/ ( *
#
/ (
*
9* " '
&%
2
*
*
!
%
*
-!!"
%
*
" '
*
* ( !
1 *
6!
*
:
;
+
**
%<
= %
%
2 %
(2
2!
*
2
.
!"
*
** 42
+
*
.
!"!
** 42
.#
6"!"!"
!6)78 ! !
# * ( (
!6) +
!6!"
!)!"!
-3-
*
(2
*
*
(
*
=
'> ** 42
2
!67,76!66
6"!"!"
3 )!!8
)!!-
' 3
"!8!"-
2 ;
+
/$/
$/!
*
=
.#!
+ *(
=
)!
=
!
# *
=
*
*
!
.%/% ,
% %/& %,&%% %%
0 %& / , 1 2 1
/, % / "3, %1 %14% 5, - 6 7-0 1 wherein specific remedy (ies) for any grievance (s) which any person may have in respect to proceedings undertaken therein are clearly provided. Interference in said matters by the High Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has to be minimal and actuated only in exceptional and extraordinary circumstances. Availing of financial facility by petitioners from the respondent, subsequent financial
-4indiscipline for reasons as may be, with proceedings under SARFAESI Act being initiated are a matter of record. Useful
< (
% *
!
" #$% &'
( $ )) * 1(
+ !.% & 3,&1 ! %-,19,
% % ,
@"6!!!!!!!A
/
1(
+ 7
2
2
(
!
9999999999999999999999999999999 ")!
2
/
!
9*
% 2
$ +
(
9*
!
?%
9*
/
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999 "-!
%<
-)
%2
' 0 2!
) ) 33 6""!
?% %
(
?%
/ (
/
(
(
=
-5- $*
*
*
!
"8"
(2
9* 2
9*
@ *
@
**
?% !
99999999999999999999999999999999999 " !
/
7
/ % =
9
9
*
(
< =
2
/
(
*
** * !@ 7!
%
9*
9
(!
(
% /
** *
>?%
!
8!
C*
2/
** *
2 *
!
A
(
%
2 2 %
/ + * 2 % * !
9*
*
%!
-!!"
2
*
"-
*
*
D
/
-6-
2
** * >?%
/
%
2
,!
%
"-
%
** *
*
>?%
/!
9*
*
!
"!
#
**
*
( /!
!
"
# $
* + (>
F>.
Whether reportable:
Yes/No