Canara Bank v. Supriya Sobti And Another

2024:PHHC:058591 [212]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH COCP-619-2020 Date of Decision : 29.04.2024 Canara Bank

...Petitioner

versus Supriya Sobti and another ....Respondents Coram :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJBIR SEHRAWAT Present :

Mr. Rakshit Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Harkirat S. Jagdev, Advocate for the respondents.

*** RAJBIR SEHRAWAT, J. (ORAL) 1.

This is a contempt petition filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for punishing the respondents for disobeying the orders dated 20.09.2019 (Annexure P-3) passed in CWP No.23389 of 2019.

2.

Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that pursuant to the order passed by the Writ Court, the respondents had offered possession of the property to the petitioner. Not only that, the application was sent to the petitioner in that regard.

3.

In view of the above, this Court does not find any ground to continue with the present petition any more.

4.

Dismissed.

RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.04.30 05:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

2024:PHHC:058591 COCP-619-2020 -25.

However, if any grievance of the petitioner is left un-redressed, it would be at liberty to raise the same in any other alternate remedy, but in accordance with law. (RAJBIR SEHRAWAT) JUDGE 29.04.2024 'R. Sharma'

Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.04.30 05:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document