Pankaj Goyal Alias Gupta Alias Pankaj Gupta v. State Of Haryana And Another

 

 



 

  
   

      





 !"

# $% # 



$%

&'( )&*

+%%, - $

.



 %/,

0'(


 
 
  

  

& 

& .12

.314 5 & 6 0& & 01 +76 314

4 *28


  


 %6 0& 0 6 8 1 *& +  
&
 & 9*67 6 &&  :  

';*& ( 0 8< 6

=
4 -&8 36&8< 6 &1 5  6  6 8 1 8< && "& *1 & 6 0&  6  001 *& +

>
&
 3 1 8< 6 *0&  00& 6?1  3 366 3 113  @  36&& 6*76 6 0& *76  2*&?     @   36& 6 ?  6 0& 3 &&  >  



A 3&  8 0&*  3 &081<  6  3 2*&  :    /35&4 

   6 6 1  001 *??7 6 3  & 07 6  ?<  6 861 366 3 0  6 ? <4 635&4 6  3 3 3& &5 

   36 *1  00&  6 & 

   6 &1 5  *0&

3 1 8<
*& && / 0&< & 1<  00&*<  7 6  3 ;? 366 ?< 5 8 *82    7&5 0&2* 611 8 *  6 *0&  6 8  ;?  6  3

+  && 6 ?< 0&2* 6 &  6 0&5 &0  0&0  8 04 6&&4 6&   <  *7   6?

 B 6& &0  6 7

/& %6 &1
*& 1 6 0&<&  6 0&  *?? 6 34 & 366 

   6 0& 6 1  001 *??7 6 3  0 6  ?<  6 ? <4   00& &?

;*&  635&4 6  3 3 3& &5 

   8* 36 *1  00&  :    87  6&   6 5 3 1 The object underlying Section 311 CrPC is that there may not be failure of justice on account of mistake of either party in bringing the valuable evidence on record or leaving ambiguity in the statements of the witnesses examined from either side. The determinative factor is whether it is essential to the just decision of the case. The significant expression that occurs is "at any stage of any inquiry or trial or other proceeding under this Code, as was held by Hon'ble The Supreme Court in the case of V N Patil Vs. Niranjan Kumar, (2021) 3 SCC 661.

Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, particularly in wake of depositing the diet money and two witnesses having also been served and to secure ends of justice, the trial Court is directed to grant one opportunity to the petitioner to examine the witnesses mentioned in the

  application, subject to deposit of costs of Rs.15,000/- to be paid to respondent No.2.

Disposed of accordingly.


  

















   !"#$%#&
 '
(