Jatinderpal Singh And Another v. Sho P.S. Sadar Amritsar And Others

CRM-M-39755-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-39755-2024 Date of Decision: 20.08.2024 Manpreet Kaur ...PeƟƟoner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Priyanshu Kamra, Advocate, for the peƟƟoner. (through video conferencing). Ms. SwaƟ Batra, D.A.G., Punjab.

(through video conferencing).

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) FIR No.

Dated Police StaƟon SecƟons 26.01.2024 Mullanpur, District SAS Nagar, Punjab 380 IPC The present peƟƟon has been filed under SecƟon 528 of BNSS Act, 2023 for issuance of necessary direcƟons to the respondent No. 2 and 3 to look into the maƩer and to take appropriate acƟon for conducƟng fair invesƟgaƟon of above capƟoned FIR. 2.

NoƟces are served upon the official respondents through the State's counsel. Given the nature of the order that this Court proposes to pass, neither the response of official respondents nor the issuance of noƟces to the private respondents is required. 3.

AŌer arguing for some Ɵme, counsel for the peƟƟoner submits that he would be contended and saƟsfied, in case he is permiƩed to file a fresh representaƟon and concerned authority be directed to decide the same in a Ɵme bound manner. 4.

Let the peƟƟoner/vicƟm make a representaƟon to the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police in this regard, within two weeks from today. If the peƟƟoner files a representaƟon with in the above-menƟoned Ɵme period of two weeks, then, the same shall be decided by the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police, within two months, either himself/herself or by authorizing and delegaƟng it to any officer holding JYOTI 2024.08.21 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

CRM-M-39755-2024 IPS cadre. It is clarified that such order must be a reasoned order, and the same be communicated to the representaƟonists without delay. In the representaƟon, peƟƟoner to menƟon the email id of his counsel so that the concerned officer could communicate them the outcome.

5.

Liberty reserved to the peƟƟoner to file fresh peƟƟon or to take other legal remedies in accordance with the law.

6.

It is clarified that there is no adjudicaƟon on merits. It is further clarified that this order shall not come in the way if the interrogaƟon of the peƟƟoner is required in any cognizable case.

7.

There would be no need for a cerƟfied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the PeƟƟoner and State can download this order and other relevant parƟculars from the official web page of this court and aƩest it to be a true copy. The concerned officer can also verify its authenƟcity and may download and use the downloaded copy for immediate use.

PeƟƟon is disposed of to the extent menƟoned above. All pending applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 20.08.2024 JyoƟ-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

JYOTI 2024.08.21 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.