Sushma Sehgal v. Rishi Setia

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-A-1576-MA-2016 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.08.2018 Smt. Sushma Sehgal ..... Applicant

Versus

Rishi Setia ..... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: None for the applicant.

Ms. Priyanka S. Prashar, Advocate for Mr. Viraj Gandhi, Advocate for respondent No. 1. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Despite the case having been called twice, the applicant has gone un-represented.

Perusal of the file shows that on the previous date also, the applicant had gone un-represented. Therefore, it can safely be presumed that the applicant or her counsel is no more interested in pursuing the instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application.

Resultantly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Application, is dismissed for want of prosecution.

August 03, 2018 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Rishu Kataria 2018.08.06 15:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document