Deepak Alias Mukul v. State Of Punjab
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH (O&M) Date of decision: 11.05.2022 Deepak @ Mukul
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
****
!etitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 229 dated 31.08.2020 registered under Sections 302, 148, 149 IPC, at Police Station Gate Hakima, District Amritsar.
" # " $% $& '$'' ())*( +) (" ) " ( , Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case; that the petitioner was not named in the FIR, he was indicted on the disclosure statement of the co-accused, but the complainant has not named the petitioner even in his supplementary statement recorded on 02.09.2020; that there were three injuries on the person of the deceased; that no specific injury has been attributed to the petitioner and only the kick and fist blows have been attributed to him; that the petitioner has been in custody since 07.07.2021 and that similarly placed coMANGAL SINGH 2022.05.11 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
accused Vikas @ Akash @ Kodi, has already been granted regular bail by a Coordinate Bench vide order dated 27.01.2022. The investigation is complete. - #)" "
) " ) # )) )
.) #" / The petitioner has been in custody since 07.07.2021. The petitioner was not named in the FIR, he was named by the complainant in the supplementary statement. No specific injury has been attributed to the petitioner, the kick and fist blows attributed to the petitioner, which are not corroborated by the postmortem repot. The conclusion of the trial would take time. Hence, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars.
/ #
# )) " ) #
" (01"
2 0 ,3 405 2
3 405 MANGAL SINGH 2022.05.11 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document