Rajinder Nagpal Alias Rajender Nagpal And ORS v. Chander Shekhar Khare And ANR

COCP No.689 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.689 of 2025 DATE OF DECISION :- 03.03.2025 Rajinder Nagpal alias Rajender Nagpal and others

...Petitioners

Versus

Chander Shekhar Khare and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present:- Mr. Kanwar Abhay Singh, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr. Athar Ahmad, DAG, Punjab.

*** HARKESH MANUJA , J.

(Oral) 1.

Short reply/compliance report by way of affidavit of Sh. Rakesh Saini, Estate Officer-I, HSVP, Gurugram on behalf of the respondents has been filed in Court, which is taken on record. 2.

Ms. Nihar Bala, Advocate for Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondents, which is taken on record.

Learned counsel representing the respondents submits that the amount of compensation payable to the petitioners has been sanctioned on 28.02.2025 and the same shall be released to them within three weeks from today.

3.

In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition.

4.

Dismissed as not pressed.

PARVINDER SINGH 2025.03.05 09:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

COCP No.689 of 2025 5.

Rule stands discharged.

6.

However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioners would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/-as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioners towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application.

(HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE 03.03.2025 P.Singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2025.03.05 09:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment