Sunita Verma v. Gajender Sharma & ORS

-1Crl. Misc. No. M-10368 of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-10368 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.07.2015 Smt. Sunita Verma ....Petitioner

Versus

Gajender and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: - Mr. Ashok Tyagi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate, for respondent No.1. PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL) CRM No.23331 of 2015 Allowed. Reply of respondent No.1 along with Annexures R-1/1 to R-1/6 is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. CRM-M-10368 of 2013 Instant petition has been filed for setting aside the order dated 22.10.2012 (Annexure P-3) passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurgaon, vide which summoning order dated 08.08.2012 passed by learned JMIC, Gurgaon, has been set aside and the respondents have been discharged.

Learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that complaint has already been dismissed in default vide order dated 05.12.2014 and till date same has not been got revived. Thus, present petition has been rendered infructuous.

RAVINDER SINGH 2015.07.31 08:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

-2Crl. Misc. No. M-10368 of 2013 Dismissed as infructuous. However, in case the complaint is restored, petitioners will be at liberty to get revived this petition. (Paramjeet Singh) Judge July 27, 2015 R.S.

RAVINDER SINGH 2015.07.31 08:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document