Yogesh Kumar v. State Of Punjab & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-12313-2010 (O&M) Decided on : 06.09.2024 YOGESH KUMAR . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS . . . Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH PRESENT:

Ms. Meher Sachdev, Advocate and Mr. M.S.Sachdev, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Randhir Singh Thind, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Arjun Pratap Atma Ram, Advocate for respondent No.3.

**** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral) This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the order dated 29.01.2010 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar and order dated 21.06.2006 (Annexure P-2) passed by ld. Sub-Divisional Executive Magistrate Jalandhar.

2.

At the very outset, learned counsel for respondent No.3 submits that the respondent has sold his share of the property and the purchaser is in possession. The present dispute pertains to proceedings under Section 145 inter se the petitioner and the respondent. Proceedings in respect of the sale are subject matter of challenge in the district Court, Jalandhar, therefore, present petition is rendered infructuous.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has not controverted the submissions made by the learned counsel for respondent No.3. 4.

In view of above, nothing survives in the present petition and the same is disposed of as infructuous.

KAVITA NAIN 2024.09.06 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment

CRM-M-12313-2010 (O&M) - 2 - 5.

However, petitioner is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

6.

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE 06.09.2024 Kavita Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No KAVITA NAIN 2024.09.06 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment