← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/13532/1999dismissed

Lakhwinder Singh & ANR v. Commissioner,Panchyat Land Chd & ORS

2022-09-27Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur,Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat8 pages

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

CWP135321999

Reserved on: 21.09.2022

Pronounced on: 27.09.2022 

 

 



 





  !

"##!   

$  CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S. SHEKHAWAT %

& ' ( )

 & !% 

 ( ( 

 !% 

)+,-   ( (

!%-!.& //// SURESHWAR THAKUR , J.

0   

!

 

  #23+0444!

% 5

,#!& 

  

  3+320444!

% 5

,+ FACTUAL BACKGROUND # -    !  (  6 !       

 -

        )  27  *  0448  &



1  *



9*

.&

 %!0420

*

 

:  %:

  1      &

!   

*    

.





!*     !

  ;





2 +     &

!    **   

 &

#23+0444!& 



<  &  

 &  

 &    

&

%

 %  

;

%

 %  

 

 3+320444!

*

 



** 

#23+0444!

 





*

!&

!&  -  ( 6 1

* !

&



 

&

  SUBMISSIONS OF THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS =



 

 !

 *  )27*0448&



!    -     

   *

      &

 

 

!  &   



#000044=!

   1



&!

 #000044=!

        

  

 *   

      

 

 

     

> & 

1! &

 & ,   & &

#

 

     

3

   

  #  

 =    *  :  %:!

  

*  &  

*

  *             

!

   

   

   !& !

!

    

 * %1

!     * 

&  

        

!   !*     (



!     

 5

  

 5



04201!





 &

* 

!* :&

.

*     

1

!





>    ?2@%!

  5



>

!

A 5555555 & 55555555 55555555 (g) ―shamilat deh , 0    &    



  

     &  B #  B +    &    



    !  1 *!   !      1      



* **  

         

*  



* 

B <   

* *

       

!  !

 ! !  

   &    B =   

& &. >       

  *    

 



B but does not include land which,,,,  A,,,,,C

4  &



 >,

 & 

B 555555555 (vi) lies outside the abadi deh and was being used as gitwar, bara, manure pit, house or for cottage industry, immediately before the commencement of this Act;] 5555555555 ANALYSES OF THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS THAT THE PETITION BEARING NO. 6/DDPO OF 1998 WAS BARRED BY THE PRINCIPLE OF RESJUDICATA.

2 % 

*

! -  

!  

  * &  * 

*&

 

5& 



% 



*

     *  

!

 

&

  

** *

!& -

 !



& -

 1  







 #000044=   

;

!*

&  

*

 

* ! &

& 



! &





*

9

*

 *

* * 

 

!

$

+ <*

@D*

 * 

!0438!



*&



*

?3. Where neither party appears, suit to be dismissed., E

 

 

 

*

    

&



5 4. 

        



        

   

  

    

                



 

                  !  "    

 # 

 

 

     

 

 

$% 8 %

 

*   & 



** 

 

!   *5



  

 

 

&   ;

!$

<*

@D!



**!

&  

! 

*

  *!& 

 

*   

 

 ;

!*&

& 

 

!

  *

**! 

!

  !

 

!   !*

 **  **  * &





 

 



** 

&

  !& *

!

   & !



*   

  

  4 @*! 

&

 

**

  1!



&  



**!  & ! 





*

!



00* 1

&

!



*

6 !



00* !  



, **

!  

 





 

)

  

  

   

**:

1!  

!

 

 

!     

* $

<

@D

 





* 



00* )

 

 ** 

 *

*

**!&!



 CONCLUSION 03

&     * 

&

   *$

<* 

@D    

5& 

7!

7



!    &.

! *

 

&

 * ! 

     & &.





*! 



*

  !

   &   

  1

!  



7



  *

*

& !    & &.



 &

&   &    

*  &   !        

  &

  1!

 & 

&



!&

&  ! *

 &.

 *!



*     *  

  

7   *  

  * !       *    **  (



!*

   



>  

! !>

&



&

   *  

! !*





 * !   *    *>*

 

& 

&  

 1!*

*

 ! 

** & !

& 





! 

& &

&  !& 

* ** 

     

  



!

  &



  *

!>

&.



!&&

 & &   !& 



 1!  &.

&

  ANALYSES OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 2 (g) (5) (vi) OF 'THE ACT' 00



: %:! 



 * !

!

 

    

  

    !!

7

*   *   

 

;





 

>

>*    !&  

 

! 

 !

  7

 

 %!!

0420;



*



  

8      !

 

 & 

    

&  & &

!  

!7



>

&  

? 

 %F FINAL ORDER

0# @ * !   

 *

& &

 & 



 ! *  !





 & &    



 ! ! 

>

 

*

 0+ @ !   *  



  

        1 

 

  ** 0< )

 (SURESHWAR THAKUR) JUDGE (N.S. SHEKHAWAT) JUDGE 27.09.2022 

  Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No