Surendra Prasad v. Union Of India And ORS

CWP-3912-2019 -12023:PHHC:085104

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3912-2019 Date of Decision : 06.07.2023 Surendra Prasad ......... Petitioner

Versus

Union of India and others ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

Mr.Devender Punia, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, Advocate for the respondent-UOI.

Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4.

Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.6.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL , J. (Oral) The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of allotment of Company Owned Company Operated Retail Outlet Dealership of the respondent- Chandigarh Industrial & Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. (CITCO).

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondents may be directed to consider his application sympathetically, if at any stage, similar applications are invited from ANJU GOEL 2023.07.06 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-3912-2019 -22023:PHHC:085104 defence officials.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in future if respondents No.2 to 4 invite applications from defence officials directly or indirectly, case of the petitioner would be considered sympathetically. In view of statement of learned counsel for the parties, the present petition stands disposed of.

( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) JUDGE 06.07.2023 anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No ANJU GOEL 2023.07.06 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document