Satish Kumar Jain And ANR v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9149-2021 Date of Decision: 24.08.2022 Satish Kumar Jain and another ......... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ......... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Manuj Nagrath, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Virat Rana, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Rahul Bhargava, Advocate for the complainant. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

This fact has not been disputed by the learned State counsel on the instructions from the concerned official.

Given above, the present petition is allowed and interim order dated 27.04.2022 is made absolute subject to compliance of the directions given in all interim orders.

It is clarified that in case any of the directions passed in any interim orders are not complied with, then it shall be open for the complainant to file an application for cancellation of bail as also to initiate proceedings under Section 340 Cr.P.C. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 24.08.2022 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2022.08.26 01:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document