Bahadur Singh v. State Of Punjab Through Its Secretary Cum Financial Commissioner
!
"# $!%&'&"()
*+,+ - $./ 0&(1-
0 !
"# .(2 3 ($ " -!/'
) 45 + 0 0
Mr. Nirmaljit Singh Diwana, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
0 +
/ 6
!
#
)*+
/ '.+0 1 $&$&& )1+
& &$&* )3+
, & 5 .-
5.
.. 7 .
/
"
.
- "
'5
"
& 7 7 .
, .
-
. , / '.+ && 6 / '.+
.
,
,.
.. 7 .
/
)*+ &3 4. )*+
,
"
,
1 $&$&& )1+ &1 ..
'5
'
/*3
&$&3+ ,
, "
& &$&* )3+ 3 9
. ,
#
! . '
+
, 1
.
,!
"
,.
* 6
.
.-
....- - . 2
.
"
!
.: " ". ;
< : - .0 "
.
.: 9
"
,
.
, "
=
.-
, ..
,."
.-
,.
6, 9
6,
, ..- "
"
"
,. .
...-
- 9
, , Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 2217 of 2024 titled as "Murti Devi Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.," decided on 09.07.2025; the relevant extract of the same reads as under: "8. Moreover, it is a settled position that choice of the Collector in respect to appointment to the post of Lambardar should not be set aside until and unless there is patent illegality or perversity pointed out therein. Interference is also not called for only on the ground that two views may be possible. In this respect gainful reference can be made to judgments of this High Court in Neeraj Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and others, 2013
(4) RCR (Civil) and Sukhminder Singh Vs. the Financial Commissioner and others 1992 PLJ 325"
> )*+
"
..
-
...-
- " - " - "
,."
..-
.
? ..
. '
-
..
.
0 *+,+
@
!: A :/ @ ,. A :/