← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRR/212/2021allowed

Kiran Auto Mobiles And Another v. State Of Punjab And Another

2023-08-24Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta2 pages

2023: PHHC: 111155

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH **** CRR-212-2021 (O&M) Decided on: 24.08.2023 Kiran Auto Mobiles and another . . . . Petitioners Vs.

State of Punjab and another . . . . Respondents **** CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA **** Present: - Mr. Arun Gupta, Advocate, for Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Praneet Singh Pandher, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Chandeep Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J.

Memo of Appearance filed on behalf of respondent No.2/SBI today in Court and the same is taken on record. 2.

In criminal complaint bearing CNR No. PBPT03-005873-2017, accused Satpal Singh (petitioner No.2 herein) being proprietor of the firm Kiran Auto Mobiles (petitioner N: 1) was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [for short 'the NI Act'] vide judgment dated 05.09.2018 passed by ld. JMIC, Patiala. Petitioner No.2 Satpal Singh was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay compensation amount of 23,00,000/- along with simple interest @ 12% p.a till final realization with default sentence. Appeal filed by the petitioners against the aforesaid judgment of conviction and order of sentence was dismissed by the Court of Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala vide order dated 28.01.2020.

VIVEK PAHWA 2023.08.28 11:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRR-212-2021 2023: PHHC:111155 3.

Though the aforesaid concurrent findings of conviction have been challenged by way of present Criminal Revision, but it is informed by ld. counsel that after dismissal of the appeal, matter has since been compromised amongst the parties and that respondent No.2/Bank had issued clearance certificate dated 31.12.2020 (Annexure A1). The certificate reads as under: - "It is to certify that M/s Kiran Automobiles had availed a Cash Credit facility bearing Account No.33348282043 (AUCA 390204855655) of Rs.36.00 Lakh from our branch on 05.02.2016. The outstanding pertaining to this account have been settled under One Time Settlement Scheme 2020-21 of the bank. The said account has been closed on 31.12.2020 and nothing is due towards this particular account."

4.

Today, learned counsel for respondent No.2-complainant has appeared and has admitted the authenticity of Annexure A1. He has no objection to accept the criminal revision and to set aside the impugned judgments of conviction and order of sentence. 5.

Offence under Section 138 of the NI Act is compoundable in nature. Compounding can be allowed at any stage. Since matter has been compromised between the parties and account stands settled, therefore, both the impugned judgments of conviction and order of sentence, as passed by Courts below, are hereby set aside. On account of the offence having been compounded, the petitioner-accused stands acquitted within the meaning of Section 320(8) Cr.P.C.

Disposed of.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE 24.08.2023 

1. Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No

2. Whether reportable?

Yes/No VIVEK PAHWA 2023.08.28 11:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document