Sandeep Kumar Alias Sunny v. Union Of India And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH




CWP No.3305 of 2024 Date of Decision:15.02.2024 Sandeep Kumar @ Sunny ....Petitioner vs.

Union of India and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. Rishu Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Shivendra Pal, Central Govt. Counsel for the Union of India Mr.Aman Dhir, D.A.G.,Punjab *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent No. 2 to re-issue him passport.

2.

Mr. Shivendra Pal, Central Government Counsel submits that petitioner in his application has not disclosed particulars of FIRs registered against him. The passport authority has come to know status of FIRs during police verification. In the absence of correct and true disclosure of pending cases by petitioner, he cannot be issued passport. There is suppression of facts on the part of petitioner, thus, the application filed by petitioner in the present form cannot be processed. The petitioner, if files a fresh application PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.02.15 05:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.3305 of 2024 -2- 2024:PHHC:021271 with correct particulars and complete information, it would be processed in accordance with law.

3.

Faced with this, counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the passport authority afresh.

4.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 15.02.2024 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.02.15 05:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document