← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/4358/2024disposed of

Sudesh v. State Of Haryana And ORS

2024-02-26Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

CWP-4358-2024 2024:PHHC:025990

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH (118) CWP-4358-2024 Date of Decision : February 26, 2024 Sudesh .. Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others .. Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI

Present:

Mr. Gaurav Verma, Advocate, for Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Nain, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1.

In the present writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that the husband of the petitioner was working with the respondentEducation Department and he unfortunately died on 13.02.2015 after which, the petitioner was granted the financial assistance of Rs.31,726/- vide order dated 11.08.2015 (Annexure P-2), which benefit has been stopped now and that too without giving any opportunity to show cause. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance raised in the present writ petition has already been raised by the petitioner through a representation dated 05.09.2023 (Annexure P-5), which is still pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioner will be satisfied at this stage in case a time bound direction is issued to the respondents to decide the said representation by passing an appropriate speaking order.

HARSHA RANI 2024.03.01 05:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-4358-2024 2024:PHHC:025990 3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Mr. Harish Nain, learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 5.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in case the representation of the petitioner dated 05.09.2023 (Annexure P-5) has been received in the office and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the authorities concerned within a period of six weeks from the receipt of copy of this order. 6.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement of learned counsel for the respondents, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 7.

Ordered accordingly.

February 26, 2024 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HARSHA RANI 2024.03.01 05:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document