← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/7417/2019dismissed

Krishan @ Kinna @ Bhola Singh v. State Of Haryana

2019-02-22Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-7417 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 22, 2019 Krishan @ Kinna @ Bhola Singh

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Kuldeep V. Singh Ahluwalia, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this fourth petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.154 dated 17.09.2014 under Sections 15, 16 of the NDPS Act, Section 61 of the Punjab Excise Act and Section 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Odhan, District Sirsa.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record.

From the record, I find that first bail petition filed by the present petitioner was dismissed on merits by passing detailed order on 23.02.2015. The second petition for grant of anticipatory bail was got dismissed as withdrawn by the present petitioner. Then, third petition filed by the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail was again dismissed by this VINEET GULATI 2019.02.26 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh Court vide order dated 17.08.2017, in which, it is mentioned that present

CRM No.M-7417 of 2019 -2petitioner has already been declared proclaimed offender. Now, instead of surrendering before the police or investigating agency, the petitioner has filed this fourth petition for grant of anticipatory bail, which amounts to abuse of process of law. No new ground or changed circumstance has been shown for filing this fourth petition. Keeping in view the above facts, no ground is made out for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner. As the petitioner, instead of surrendering, is filing petitions time and again for grant of anticipatory bail, therefore, the present petition is dismissed with costs of `25,000/- to be deposited within one month before learned CJM concerned. If the costs is not deposited, then learned CJM is directed to get it recovered as arrears of land revenue.

February 22, 2019 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VINEET GULATI 2019.02.26 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh