← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-A/1862/2017allowed

State Of Haryana v. Ranbir @ Ladoo And Others

2024-09-20Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara2 pages

CRM-27491-2017 in/and CRM-A-1862-MA-2017 STATE OF HARY ANA V/S RANBIR @ LADOO AND OTHERS Present:- Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, DAG, Haryana Mr. John Kumar, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 3. - CRM-27491-2017 Present application has been filed condonation of delay of 107 days in filing the application for leave to appeal.

Counsel for respondents No. 1 to 3 submits that no reply to the application for condonation of delay is to be filed. However, for the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 107 days in filing the application for leave to appeal, is condoned.

CRM-A-1862-MA-2017 Applicant's counsel submits that the present application was filed against acquittal in the year 2016 and he has a very good case on merit. Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the judgment of acquittal is well reasoned and leave to appeal should not be granted. He further submits that in case, this Court grants leave to appeal and admit the main appeal, its turn will not come for hearing for decades, as such pendency of the appeal may be treated in-consequential for the respondent. Leave to appeal granted.

Counsel for the respondents submits that he be exempted from furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds before the concerned trial Court or Chief Judicial Magistate. He undertakes to surrender before the majesty of Court as and when this Court directed to do so or in case of reversal of the judgment.

DINESH KUMAR 2024.09.25 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document at the bottom of left side

CRM-27491-2017in/and CRM-A-1862-MA-2017 -2Given such undertaking, there shall be no need to furnish bail bonds/surety bonds by the respondents.

Main appeal Admit.

List for final hearing on its own turn as per its queue following the roster of Negotiable Instruments Act.

It is clarified that the pendency of this appeal shall not be construed against the accused-respondents in any manner whatsoever. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 20.09.2024 dinesh DINESH KUMAR 2024.09.25 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document at the bottom of left side