Moti Lal v. Inderjeet

CRM-A-2687-MA-2018
 CRM-A-2687-MA-2018 Moti Lal vs. Inderjeet

Present:

Mr. Vikas Saroha, Advocate For the applicant.

Mr. Anshul Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.

***** CRM-A-2687-MA-2018 Applicant's counsel submits that the present application was filed against acquittal in the year 2018 and he has a very good case on merit. Mr. Anshul Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent and filed his memo of appearance, which is taken on record. He submits that the judgment of acquittal is well reasoned and leave to appeal should not be granted. He further submits that in case, this Court grants leave to appeal and admit the main appeal, its turn will not come for hearing for decades, as such pendency of the appeal may be treated in-consequential for the respondent.  Leave to appeal granted.

Counsel for the respondent submits that he be exempted from furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds before the concerned trial Court or Chief Judicial Magistate. He undertakes to surrender before the majesty of Court as and when this Court directed to do so or in case of reversal of the judgment.  Given such undertaking, there shall be no need to furnish bail bonds/surety bonds by the respondent.

Main appeal Admit.

List for final hearing on its own turn as per its queue following the roster. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 12.08.2024 anju rani ANJU RANI 2024.08.20 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh