Jagdish Chand v. Madhu And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-A-2711-MA-2018 Date of Decision: 21.01.2026 JAGDISH CHAND ....Applicant

Versus

MADHU AND ORS ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR

Present:

Mr. Tanvir Singh Grewal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana.

***** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 08.07.2011 Panjokhra 306/120B IPC Challenging the judgment of acquittal dated 04.09.2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ambala, in the FIR captioned above, applicant has come up before this court by filing the application for leave to appeal. 2.

Counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is stated to have been expired during pendency of the appeal.

3.

Given above, application for leave to appeal is disposed of as abated. However, it is clarified that if legal heirs of the applicant want to challenge the acquittal of private respondents, filing of the present application shall not come in their way. It is further clarified that the time for which the present application was pending, shall not be counted for the purpose of limitation. Pending applications if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 21.01.2026 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable?

No ANJU RANI 2026.01.29 10:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh