Surender v. State Of Haryana And Others
-1625-2020
"#$ %$ $ &$# " $' %($ ) % *
+, * " "-"
#$
%
%
& "-" . ''(
"
"
+' ,- ',,'
./
0'1
2*3
+4 ,+ ,' +55-
6,'76,-76,8
) +4(,
3 3
6,'765-7658 *)
9 3
,4 +' +55:
+' +' +55:
7 "
"
3
; )
+' ,- ',,'
.0'1
!
"
2
'+
!
'- ,8 ',,6 */*/0!1!2/*/ !!
3*( %$ " 4( %($&" $' %($5 2 " ) "
"
+' ,- ',,'
%"
<
)
!
%
%% "
! / % ,4 +' +55: ,- ,' +556
'.
,- ,' +556
% =
! %
"
,-
': ,: ',,,
'6 ,( ',,, %
%
< ,( ,5 ',,,
> 7
)
!=%
)
,+ ,( ',,8
! %
"
% ,8
$
>
*
3 "
,- ,' +556
/ !?% /
$6 7 ))7 899 !1!3$ 4#",3$7 5 990: !!2
@" $' % $ & 4%(;%%%
!0 !1!
$6 7))7 0! !!8
@" $' & *( %$ " 4( % ($; %%%
!!<
/
%
@ A
% In view of the above referred judicial precedents, this fact is not disputed that the case of premature release of a life convict is governed by the policy of the Government prevailing on the date of judgment of conviction and not by the policy which existed on the date of consideration
of his premature release. Undisputedly, at the time of conviction of petitioner i.e. 08.12.1995, the prevailing policy for pre-mature release of convicts was Premature Release Policy dated 04.02.1993. As per this policy, for considering the case of premature release, the condition required for life convict was to undergo 14 years of actual sentence including under-trial period
2
"
+6 ,' ',', +'
'8 "
$
"
,6
'- "
*( %$" 4(+ . 1 %
"
!
"
%
$
% %
> "
*
"
+- +5
,+ ,' ',++ .$=(77#&" $' %($5.
2*3
6,'76(-76887:++ *)
>
,(
%
@-67- >$&$#" # ?@ % ($; !1 3 5352 !.
>
"
,-0,'0+556
'
.
%
"
,6
'- "
$ "
*( %$" 4(+ . 1
"
$
7 )> " '.%1 "
%
+,
"
%
%"
"
3"-" 5 6=AB
B
73 CD
< B 3 % CD
<