← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/8861/2024allowed

Lovejeet Singh @ Labha v. State Of Punjab

2024-05-02Mr. Justice Sanjiv Berry2 pages

N.C. No.2024:PHHC:060640

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8861-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.05.2024 LOVEJEET SINGH @ LABHA ....Petitioner(s)

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present :

Mr. Bhisham Kinger, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Ankit Grewal, DAG Punjab.

***** SANJIV BERRY. J. (Oral) 



                    

  

 



 

        

 !"# $%

& '

(   )  

   



**

+,-,*-* * $(  ./%  /

 0

0 

*, 



   

 

   

      

    -+,-,*-*

      

 

  2



  

4          

    4 

     

 

  

   , , 

  

 

 

 %"5 

 4,,   

     

 

 2



4     

6   



4     

     6   



4  , ,  , +, /  4  

   4 -+,-,*-*   4  



)'

SANDAL SHARMA 2024.05.06 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

" 1. Reply dated 05.04.2024 in the form of an affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub-Division, Patti, District N.C. No.2024:PHHC:060640 CRM-M-8861-2024 (O&M) -2Tarn Taran has been filed. The same is taken on record. Copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case on the alleged disclosure statement of co-accused Gursewak Singh.

3. He further contends that the petitioner has nothing to do with the said transaction nor has he ever involved in dealing in the narcotics.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no other case is registered against the petitioner under NDPS Act and is ready to join the investigation.

5. Per contra, learned State Counsel on instructions from ASI Sewak Singh, P.S. Sarhali, District Tarn Taran has not disputed the factual matrix and has intimated that no previous case under NDPS Act is registered against the petitioner.

6. Be it as the case may be.

7. Without commenting on the merits of the case, the petitioner is hereby directed to join investigation within seven days from today and in the event of his arrest, he is ordered to be released on interim bail on his furnishing personal/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. He shall also abide by conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C."

8,

 4    3      3   



      

   



        

 

2

  

4  

6

 

    -+,-,*-*

    

 4 

3  

 -+,-,*-* 

     2     

 

3 4  

   $*( ,,,!    

 

    2 

4  

 

 6      

      

  

 "

4  4:   

   

 

;      

  3

    

   

    3   

      

    ,

, 0 

  

   , (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE  S.Sharma(syr) SANDAL SHARMA 2024.05.06 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment