Seema v. State Of Haryana And Others

CWP No. 4043-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB ANDHARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No. 4043-2019 Date of decision:-21.02.2019 SEEMA .....Petitioner vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Neeraj Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Addl.A.G Haryana RITU BAHRI, J.(Oral) Petitioner is participating in the selection process for the post of Female Education but she has not been called for Physical Screening Test as per notice dated 07.02.2019 (P-4). The petitioner has given right answers to 59 questions.

Learned State counsel has produced OMR sheet of the petitioner today in the Court in a sealed cover, which has been opened by the Reader of this Court. Learned State counsel has argued that the petitioner has smudged one answer i.e Question no. 89 in the OMR sheet and as per condition No. 7 of the OMR sheet, his candidature was rejected. Further the condition No. 7 has been considered by this Court in LPA No. 92/2017 titled as Anshu and others vs. State of Haryana and others, dismissed on 20.01.2017. Against this order, the petitioners filed appeal before Hon'ble the Supreme Court, which also stands dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to cite any Gaurav Arora 2019.03.07 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh judgment contrary to the above.

CWP No. 4043-2019 In view of the above factual position, the present petition also stands dismissed.

The OMR sheet of the petitioner brought in the Court today in a sealed cover, has been given back to learned State counsel. (RITU BAHRI) 21.02.2019 JUDGE G Arora Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gaurav Arora 2019.03.07 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh