Bani Singh And ORS v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CRM-M- 6953 of 2020 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M- 6953 of 2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 17.2.2020 ...

Bani Singh and others ................Petitioners vs.

State of Haryana and others .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. R.A. Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioners.

...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) By way of filing the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., petitioners - Bani Singh and others, who are accused in criminal complaint, titled 'Chiranji Lal etc. vs. Raghbir etc.', pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate Ist class, Charkhi Dadri, seek quashing of the criminal complaint, as well as the summoning order passed by the trial Magistrate and order dismissing their revision petition by Additional Sessions Judge, Charkhi Dadri. I have heard Learned counsel for the petitioners, besides going through the record.

After perusal of the complaint in question, it cannot be said that it does not disclose commission of any cognizable offence or that it is an abuse of the process of Court. The summoning order passed is BANITA CHUGH 2020.02.18 14:14 I am the author of this document

CRM-M- 6953 of 2020 -2quite detailed and well reasoned. Similarly, the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Charkhi Dadri, dismissing the revision petition filed by the accused challenging the summoning order, does not appear to be suffering from any illegality or infirmity. No ground is there to quash the impugned complaint and impugned orders. The matter is pending trial. The petitioners may take all the pleas available to them in the trial Court at appropriate time.

However, the petition is without any merit and is dismissed accordingly.

( H.S. Madaan ) 17.2.2020 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No BANITA CHUGH 2020.02.18 14:14 I am the author of this document