Balbir Singh v. State Of Haryana And ANR

CRM-A-2273-MA-2017 (O&M) - 1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-A-2273-MA-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.09.2024 Balbir Singh .... Applicant

Versus

State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - None for the applicant.

Ms. Deepshikha Chauhan, A.A.G., Haryana.

Mr. J.S.Saneta, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Challenge in the present application is to impugned judgment dated 24.07.2017 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Exclusive Court for Heinous Crimes against Women), Kurukshetra, whereby the accused/respondent No.2, namely, Vikas Kumar has been acquitted of the charges levelled against him in case FIR No. 106 dated 10.11.2016 registered under Sections 452, 506 IPC, 3 of SC/ST Act and 8 of the POCSO Act, at Police Station Jhansa (District Kurukshetra). The matter pertains to the year 2017. Perusal of the order sheets shows that the matter was adjourned at the request of learned counsel for the applicant on 20.12.2017 and 06.09.2023. There was no representation on behalf of the applicant on the last 3 dates of hearing i.e. 11.02.2020, 24.05.2023 and 16.02.2024. Today also, none appeared on DIVYANSHI 2024.09.10 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-A-2273-MA-2017 (O&M) - 2behalf of the applicant. Therefore, it can safely be presumed that the applicant or his counsel is not interested in pursuing the present application.

In view of the above, the present application stands dismissed.

Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. 10.09.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Divyanshi JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No DIVYANSHI 2024.09.10 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document