Doli Rajput v. State Of Ut Chd And ANR



  
       


   

!"!

# $ % %   &!

'() %%%%%% !!

# * + *")"

,


-#!.*- # # - *

%%%%%%  "( # #"

 $

 /0 % ,


 1 




 
  






  
 




 


  

 


"

####  1 

%

3*&4

$







 !
% !


&'
()(
 
() *+ "*"(
!


,"*

("*- ' 
.

/ 

"0



1 
 22

3
*, *4 "*""

..$!

$ 
 - 5
 

 
1
.



,)"



% !


 
&'

()(
 
() *+ "*"(


,"*

("*- !

.

-"0

 
1 

 

2.


 
"+ *+ "*"( 67
-"8
.!
$
..

1% !
!
2

9
: 9
 






1 .

 


  

 
!


1 .


"
2

7
 22

.

$








$





 
 




1
 '..

% ! ; .


"< *4 "*""


 





!
   2 $ !

  22;.2


'..

% ! ; .



 12


.!
$


 2
  


1

7
 

 !
 !


..$!
2 

$..- 68

21







 &'= 68
>


.

2 = 68 
 !

 .;!= 68
>

22

! . 

$


 
.

68 >

22
 
1
 $
..




$
..
 2.

68;9


2


""

*) "*""

   .

1

(- 
1
.
 
1

7
 

 !


 ?

 


 


2
 .
 @ .
! 

 
1

$




 






 .

 


..$- ( 

.



 2.

:.
 9
A

 







.



2.


 2.

 $ 
2 


 &'


 2

'3

"


 

1
.



.

2 

<



 



 !

$ !

 ..

,


22

!
.  $




.



.


2.



.





22
 
1
 1$
2 ?


  

 




"

2

 

 
 !
22

 
 
 

19

 

&'

..
!
subsequent thereto against the petitioner are quashed.

Similarly, Ms. Tanyaa Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. C.S. Bakhshi, APP, U.T. Chandigarh has stated no objection in case the FIR is quashed based upon the compromise entered between the parties. !

$

 
 

 1.



,"*

("*-


'

$


 
1 1 

2 1.

22
 
1


 

..$

&'
()(
 
() *+ "*"(
!



,"*

("*-

' 
.

/ 

"0



..
!
subsequent thereto are hereby quashed. 3 1 

 % % 











: >


!;  B >
 1.