Naveen v. Union Of India And Other
CWP-4814-2020 (O&M) - 1-
CWP-4814-2020
"
#
$ %&!'
( )*!+%
%,-!
., +) ,-
# $ Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG Haryana
/!
0
!*
#
*
, '
'
,
%
%##
) &'
)# ,1
( *
!
,
+.
,
)
,
.
% ,
+
+)
(3
+4
+
.!
!
+.!!
56/!
7
(
)
/!
4
+9!.
,
::;3<=%$
> '
)!
1
!
&
* ! ! 9
!
&
* ,
, /!
6=@$)36
CWP-4814-2020 (O&M) - 2- )!
, 3
4
+ 9!.
*
0
*!
* ,
(- ''
= )
, '
*
* ! 0 ( /!
9
)!
, 3
+ 9!.
,
>@ 3<=%$
> '
#, &,
.
&
(*
4
+9!.
,()
&
! !&
!
,
.
'
&(
,
.!!!
&
1
! !&
!
(&
#, , .
&
9
/!
,
>@ 3<=%$
>
'
+
6=@$)36
6
,,
3
3,
(3
* #
, !
=A *+
#
.
*
#
. !
93=9"-=-"- @/!
4
+9!.
,
:=) )
% ,
A
, , + - '
*
+4
!8
' , *
/!
# .
'
!,
) ;/!
0
4
-
, # )!
,*
, 9
.!!
&(
+4
+ 9!.
)
:/!
)!
=$)36
6>
)!
, 3
4
+ 9!.
+
3
+ "
8 )
, + "
8
0
( *
)
, # )!
,*+"
8 #
.
*
*
*
B
!
,, *
,0
,
#
&
,, .*#
, +.!!
56/!
,0
,
%%+
'
$
CWP-4814-2020 (O&M) - 3CD
, E
. !@F
8 **
*
. !
! !(
,
&G !
'
(=& *(= '#
'
&(4" +A C @/!
##,
%
%##
%%+ ; &
! .
!
,
4 ,
.
#
+ !( ,H / H/ .
,
,'
("
,3?
%
*,(+
*. ! ,,
,
.
)-!,8 ,
;
##
H ,3
,'
,3?
+!
6 ; /!
,'
#
,
, #!( ,
,
* ,
(+ * + , (
'
*
&
&(
( 4 "
#'
+A
'
: /!
*
,
.
&
#
,
E+
&( C4
, # )!
,*C+.!!
&
( 4 "
#'
+A
'
- #(
H $>=;)!
6:+
&(
( 4 "
#'
+
)!
, 3
2
(+ A
'
+
* , "
3
9
!
. !
%
"$ >/!
,, *
'
&(
!
,
.
, &'
#
I
,
.
,(
*!,( &
4
,
.
.
'
&
$
!
*
, (
#,
&,
& 5.
Hon'ble the Supreme Court in State vs. Umesh Kumar1, while referring to the judgment in Punjab SEB v. Malkiat Singh2, held that the mere inclusion of candidates in a selection list does not confer upon them a vested right )--@;
(2005) 9 SCC 22
CWP-4814-2020 (O&M) - 4to appointment and in Rakhi Ray vs. High Court of Delhi,3 observed that empanelment simply establishes eligibility for consideration and under no circumstance equates to selection or creates an enforceable claim to the position, the process of filling vacancies must be conducted in alignment with statutory rules and constitutional principles.
7.
On the aforesaid anvil and as a fall out thereof, the present petition being sans merit, is hereby dismissed "#$!!"!% J
<!
#
8*=
K = <!
&, K = )--: