Gurtej v. Pepsu Road Transport Corporation And ORS

2024:PHHC:008027

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH FAO-1529-1993 Date of Decision: 20.01.2024 Dr. Gurtej Singh ...Appellant VS PEPSU Road Transport Corporation and others

...Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY

Present:

None for the appellant.

Mr. Aman Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J (ORAL) 1.

It is apparent from the perusal of the order sheets in the present case that none had been appearing on behalf of the appellant, as such notice issued to him. As per office report he stands served, despite which there is no representation.

2.

In view of the aforesaid, there is no option but to dismiss the present appeal for want of prosecution, reserving with the parties, a liberty to get the same revived.

3.

Ordered accordingly.

(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 20.01.2024 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No HAMANT 2024.01.22 17:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment