Jagdish Kumar v. State Of Punjab & ORS

2023:PHHC:145072

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-A No. 872-MA of 2016 Date of Decision: 14.11.2023 Jagdish Kumar -Appellant

Versus

State of Punjab and others -Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant-appellant.

Mr. Ravinder Singh, A.A.G., Punjab.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the applicant-appellant submits that leave to appeal filed by the State is also listed for today and he would be sa3sfied if he is permi4ed to assist/represent as appellant No.2 in the said appeal and permi4ed to withdraw the present leave to appeal.

2.

On the other hand, counsel for the accused submits that the appellant has no locus to file the present leave to appeal as he does not fall in the defini3on of vic3m as he is only an informant. 3.

Given the submission of the State counsel as well as counsel for the applicant, the present leave to appeal is disposed of and applicant is permi4ed to assist the State in the appeal filed by the State of Punjab and he is arrayed as appellant No.2 in the said appeal. He is also permi4ed to argue the ma4er separately at the 3me of final hearing. All pending applica3ons, if any shall also stands disposed of. 14.11.2023 Jyo" Sharma (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Jyoti Sharma 2023.11.17 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Sector 1, High Court, Chandigarh