Rohtash v. State Of Haryana

2024:PHHC:050348 CRM-M-8313-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (217) CRM-M-8313-2024 Date of Decision:-15.04.2024 Rohtash ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ......Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN ****

Present:

Mr. Sourabh Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

**** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1.

Prayer is for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.284 dated 18.10.2023, under Section 379-B, 506, 34 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Nangal Chaudhary, District Mahendergarh in which Section 392, 397, 201, 120-B were added later and Section 379-B of IPC was deleted.

2.

Vide order dated 06.03.2024, this Court while granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail directed the petitioner to join investigation.

3.

Learned State counsel, on instructions submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is no longer required.

4.

In view of above, the petition is allowed. The order dated 06.03.2024 granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the Investigating Agency and shall abide by the Manju 2024.04.18 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

2024:PHHC:050348 CRM-M-8313-2024 conditions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

5.

However, nothing stated above shall be construed as a final expression of opinion on the merits of the case. 6.

It is made clear that, in case, the petitioner is found involved in any such activity once again, the State is at liberty to promptly move an appropriate application for cancellation of bail detailing out the circumstances and violation of the condition(s) of bail. (ALOK JAIN) 15.04.2024 JUDGE manju Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No Manju 2024.04.18 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document