Sonia Rani v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M-8929-2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8929-2022(O&M)

Reserved on: 07.04.2022

Pronounced on: 18.04.2022 Sonia Rani

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Hitesh Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Jaspreet Kaur, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Veeraj Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advocate for the complainant. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 11.10.2021 Canal Colony, 302, 120-B IPC Bathinda, District Bathinda 1.

The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above had come up before this Court under Section 438 Cr.P.C seeking anticipatory bail. This court had granted interim protection subject to the petitioner joining the investigation. 2.

The status report reveals that although the petitioner's joined the investigation but is not fully co-operating.

3.

The status report further reveals that as per the Chemical Examiner's report, no poison was detected in pathological exhibits. 4.

Without commenting on the case's merits, in the facts and circumstances peculiar to this case, the interim order granting bail is made absolute subject to the petitioner fully co-operating the investigator and complying with the terms and the conditions of interim order. If the victim(s) notice any violation of this order, they may inform the SHO of the concerned police station, the trial court, or even this court, and on this ground JYOTI 2022.04.18 15:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-8929-2022 alone, the bail may be cancelled.

Petition allowed in aforesaid terms. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 18.04.2022 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

JYOTI 2022.04.18 15:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document