Aslam v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9261-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.03.2022 Aslam ......... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ........ Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Sahil Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, DAG, Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of direction to respondents No. 1 to 3 to release the vehicle on superdari, which were seized/impound in case FIR No. 212 dated 25.08.2020 registered at Police Station Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar Notice served upon official respondents through the State's counsel. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be contented if an appropriate direction be issued to concerned SDM to decide application (Annexure P-4) within a time bound manner.

Learned State counsel submits that he has no objection if the petition is confined to such order at this stage.

Given above, the present petition is allowed by issuing direction to SDM/Executive Magistrate, Bilaspur to decide the application (Annexure P-4) by passing a speaking order within two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

In case, the grievance of the petitioner still exists, he shall be at liberty to avail legal remedy in accordance with law including approaching this Court. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 04.03.2022 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2022.03.04 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document