High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/10067/2021allowed

Anil v. State Of Haryana And Others

2021-03-08Ms. Justice Jaishree Thakur2 pages

CRM-M No.10067 of 2021 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.10067 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision.08.03.2021 (Heard through VC) Anil

...Petitioner

Vs State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Manoj Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gurbir Singh Dhillon, AAG, Haryana.

Ms. Savita Rana, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.

-.- JAISHREE THAKUR J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.276 dated 20.09.2020 under Section 365 IPC (Sections 365, 376, 506, 201 IPC, Section 3(2) (v) of SC & ST Act, 1989 and Section 67 of I.T. Act added later on) registered at Police Station Nissing, District Karnal and chargsheeted under Section 365, 376 (2), 506 IPC and Section 3(2) (v) of SC & ST Act, 1989.

Counsel for the petitioner prays for grant of regular bail to the petitioner by contending that false allegations have been levelled against the petitioner as would be evident from the fact that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties. It is further argued that in fact the matter stands settled between the parties by way of compromise dated 25.02.2021. It is also submitted that the matter stands investigated and the charges have PANKAJ KUMAR 2021.03.09 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.10067 of 2021 (O&M) -2been framed.

At this stage, appearance has been caused on behalf of the respondents No.2 and 3/complainant through counsel, who submits that the complainant would have no objection in case the petitioner is allowed regular bail as the matter stands compromised. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Keeping in view the fact that the matter between the parties stands compromised and the trial is likely to take some time to conclude, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind bars. The instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on regular bail on execution of adequate personal/surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned trial Court/Duty Magistrate. However, any observation made herein shall not be construed to be an expression on merits of the case.

(JAISHREE THAKUR) JUDGE March 08, 2021 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PANKAJ KUMAR 2021.03.09 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document