Amit v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-10073 of 2016 .....

Date of decision:28.7.2016 Amit

...Petitioner

v.

State of Haryana

...Respondent

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. L.M. Gulati, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikramjit Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

Mr. Rajkapoor Malik, Advocate for the complainant. .....

Inderjit Singh, J.

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.429 dated 12.8.2015 registered for the offences under Sections 302, 506, 323, 148 and 149 IPC at Police Station Narnaund, District Hisar.

Notice of motion has been issued in this case. Mr. Vikramjit Singh, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and Mr. Rajkapoor Malik, learned Advocate has appeared for the complainant and contested this petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Harpal Singh Parmar 2016.08.08 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-10073 of 2016 [2] Additional Advocate General, Haryana appearing for the respondent-State and have gone through the record.

From the record, I find that in the present case challan has already been presented and charges have been framed. As per the prosecution version, the FIR was got registered on the statement of Pardeep Kumar. As per the allegations, the present petitioner is named in the FIR and he was armed with Danda and he also gave injuries to the father of the complainant along with other co-accused who succumbed to the injuries. Keeping in view the nature and gravity of the offence and in view of the fact that the case is at the preliminary staged, I do not find it a fit case where the present petitioner is entitled to the benefit of regular bail. Therefore, finding no merit in this petition, the same is dismissed.

July 28, 2016.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No Harpal Singh Parmar 2016.08.08 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh