Harinder Singh Alias Romi Thr Attorney Surinder Singh v. State Of Punjab And Another

CRM-M-9034-2024























IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9034-2024 Date of decision: 05.12.2024 HARINDER SINGH @ ROMI THR ATTORNEY SURINDER SINGH

...Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. S. SHEKHAWAT

Present:

Mr. H. S. Aujla, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Deepinder Brar, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Navdeep Singh Dhillon, Advocate for respondent No.2.

**** N. S. SHEKHAWAT, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of FIR No. 91 dated 16.11.2006 registered under Sections 452, 323, 427, 506, 148 and 149 at Police Station Sudhar, District Ludhiana (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 11.12.2023 (Annexure P-9).

Vide order dated 21.10.2024 while issuing notice of motion, this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the compromise dated 11.12.2023 (Annexure P-9).

MAMTA 2024.12.10 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-9034-2024






















Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jagraon and got their statements recorded. Report dated 18.11.2024 has been received whereby after recording the statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioner(s).

Resultantly, FIR No. 91 dated 16.11.2006 registered under Sections 452, 323, 427, 506, 148 and 149 at Police Station Sudhar, District Ludhiana (Annexure P-1) alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioner(s).

(N. S. SHEKHAWAT) 05.12.2024 JUDGE M.Sikka Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No MAMTA 2024.12.10 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment