Raj Kumar v. Surinder Kaur And Others

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 1120 of 2019 Date of Decision: 28.09.2022 Raj Kumar ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

Surinder Kaur and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. KartikGupta, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. L.S.Mann, Advocate for the respondent No.1 to 3.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

In view of the two different Division Bench judgments passed in Harvinder Kaur and another vs. Godha Ram and another1979 PLJ 562 and Pritam Singh and another vs. Sunder Lal and others, 1990(2) PLR 191, the order dismissing an application for nominating a Local Commissioner to carry out demarcation or local inspection is not amenable to interference in the revisional jurisdiction. 2.

In view of the above, the present revision petition is dismissed. (Anil Kshetarpal) Judge September 28, 2022 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.09.29 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document