Vijay Kumar v. Hem Lata

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CR-1160-2020 (O & M) Date of Decision: March 04, 2020 VIJAY KUMAR .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

HEM LATA ....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL

Present:

Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. **** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J (ORAL) The matter was listed on 02.03.2020 at serial No.123 and passed over twice but nobody had put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner and in the interest of justice, it was adjourned.

Today when the matter was taken up at serial No.120 on the first call, no one had put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. On the second call, Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate has put in appearance and sought another pass-over. It is not possible to accept the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner as several opportunities have been granted to argue the case. Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate states that he has no instructions to argue the case.

Dismissed in default.

(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE March 04, 2020 A.Kaundal Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No AMIT KAUNDAL 2020.03.05 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh