Kulwant Singh Alias Bohar Singh And Another v. State Of Punjab And Another
!
"# $!%&'&"() * +,+ -./ 0 .0 0
++++! & &"(!1'
2!1'3'
0
+++!'4"($!( '
) 5. 0+ 0 - 0
- 0
+ +
1 6 ! " #$! %
& '( %)*+ & , & & -
-.#/- &-&0*1% 231$
$ 45 /6 % 7
( % %3 33 & & "45 / 6
8 % % '
9 1 7 % 3 - & & " 1 :*( % %37%33 - &, &'
& "
3;
%1/ 3/1;;
$ 3 73
73!
)*+( (
933 73% 7 ! "
9) $1
!
"#8%1 7
-# 1 7 3 % /3 ( 78%1 7 37(
77
97( %33 8<
31 $
"
%
!
#%
1 7 !1 ( 3%73/ 3 9",
%3 / "57. The position that emerges from the above discussion can be summarised thus: the power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the offences under Section 320 of the Code. Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation
' but it has to be exercised in accord with the guideline engrafted in such power viz; (i) to secure the ends of justice or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court.
xxx xxx xxx. "
, *7/
%3 % 1 %%3 3 7463/ 1 ( %)*+7( / 7
! 9 7 % %
3% ( # + !7 )*+ & , & & - -.#/- &-&0*1% 231$ $( % ( ( 46 33 & & "
45 / 6
!3+ &&&&:/ / 2) * =+1%73
.
%3 46! - 0
* +,+ 7 ($!!4 2%:
>: 2+
>: