Rakesh Kumar v. Satpal Shonki And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH (159) INCOMP-1748-2024 Date of Decision: 21.11.2024 Rakesh Kumar .....Petitioner

Versus

Satpal Shonki and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI

Present:

None.

**** VIKAS SURI , J. (Oral) 1.

The aforesaid petition was filed on 01.03.2021 by Shri Karan Choudhary, Advocate. The Registry had raised objection on the case file on 02.03.2021.

2.

As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/ party, who filed it, to be re-filed within a total period of 40 days. In spite of SMS having been sent at the registered mobile, the same was not taken back for re-filing after removal of objections. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders.

3.

A note was published by the Registry in the cause list of 18.09.2024 as well as on the website of the Court, whereby the advocates were requested to collect their cases lying with objections, which were filed upto 31.12.2023, for re-filing after removal of objections. It was further notified that all pending cases of such nature will be listed before Court for appropriate orders.

DIWAKER GULATI 2024.11.22 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

4.

Case has been listed in the urgent cause list for today. None has come present.

5.

Keeping in view the aforesaid factual matrix, no further order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the record. 6.

Disposed of.

November 21, 2024 (VIKAS SURI) d.gulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No DIWAKER GULATI 2024.11.22 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document