High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/10591/2016disposed of

Sudhanshu v. State Of Punjab And ORS

2016-11-08Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No. M-10591 of 2016 Date of decision : November 08, 2016 Sudhanshu ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh Present :

Mr. RS Chahal, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Mikhail Kad, DAG, Punjab for the respondent Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel has filed reply by way of affidavit of Sh. Achhru Ram, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Abohar, District Fazilka and the same is taken on record.

Heard. Records perused.

In the light of the averments made in the petition and the contentions of the two sides evidently there are prima facie allegations as to commission of cognizable offence and it would suffice and sub-serve the ends of justice, if directions are issued to the official respondents to consider the representation Annexure P/15 moved by the petitioner within 15 days from today, in the light of the directions of the Hon'ble Apex Court Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2016.11.11 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

Criminal Misc. No. M-10591 of 2016 -2in Lalita Kumar vs Govt. of U.P., 2013 Vol. IV, RCR (Criminal) 979. Disposed of in those terms.

( Fateh Deep Singh ) November 08, 2016 Judge 'tiwana'

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No Whether Reportable ?

Yes/No Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2016.11.11 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.