Raj Kumar v. Mool Chand

 


 



 



  

 






!
"#$# %&

'( )( 


















 

  
     
    CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA  

  !

"

 # $ %%&'"

 SUBHAS MEHLA *
(

+ 1.

The present application has been preferred under Section 378

(4) of Cr.P.C. seeking grant of leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 18.12.2019 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Faridabad in a complaint case filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as 'NI Act'). 2.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in M/s Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc., 2025(3) RCR (Criminal) 208, after considerable discussion and comparative interpretation of Sections 372 and 378(4) of Cr.P.C., concluded that the victim has a right to file an appeal under Section 372 of Cr.P.C. before the Court of Sessions. Reliance in this regard can also be placed on Satish Kumar Versus Jugal Kishor in CRM-A-2700-MA-2018 decided on 02.07.2025. Further still, applying the doctrine of prospective overruling, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SEEMA 2025.09.23 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

 


 Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Vs. Raj Kumar Arora in SCC Online 819 has clarified that as a rule of thumb, judgments rendered shall be applicable retrospectively.

3.

Therefore, in view of the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in Celestium Financial (supra), the present application seeking leave to appeal is remanded back to the learned Sessions Judge, concerned with a direction to treat the same as an appeal filed under Section 372 of the Cr.P.C. and entrust it to an appropriate Court for its disposal. 4.

The Registry is directed to send the complete paper-book and the record of the case to the learned Sessions Judge concerned forthwith. 5.

Disposed of accordingly.

SUBHAS MEHLA ()*+,*,-












   
   SEEMA 2025.09.23 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document